Human Population Cycle

Human Population Cycle

Current world population: 7.4+ billion

world pop growth

Recent Human Population Explosion

Ecologists have described numerous examples of boom and bust population cycles in which the explosive growth of a species’ numbers is followed by rapid decline.  Compared to the population cycles of other species, the human population’s global extent and impact are remarkable.  Our technology has helped us spread across the globe harvesting resources, and changing soil, water, and plant life far more than any other species ever has.

Consequences of Our Population Explosion

Human population impacts take many forms.  Here’s an example that may seem insignificant until one considers how often this happens around the world.

Mere Presence Alone

Common Blackhawk

Common Blackhawk

In 2013, a Blackhawk family moved onto Coldwater Farm [LINK].  The hawks built a nest in a tall Cottonwood down by the Agua Fria River that runs through the eastern edge of the Farm.  Blackhawks are large black birds with a white band across their tails.  They are uncommon and they avoid humans.  This year (2016), I watched the fledglings learning to fly.  Just like the young Red-tailed hawks at the west end of the farm, the young Blackhawks scream in fear and ecstasy as they make those first great diving swoops.  I’m sure the two adults circling above were near collapse with anxiety.

Blackhawks, unlike many other hawk species, will not remain in an area frequented by humans.  At Coldwater Farm, we try to discourage would-be river explorers and hikers, but some get in because we can’t watch constantly.  So far, the number of trespassers has been small, but this could change.  Developers keep trying to alter local zoning restrictions so they can increase housing density around the Farm.  So far, we’ve blocked their efforts.  If they ever win, the number of people tramping along the river will increase.  The same threat extends across the Blackhawk range.  With growing population around the world, sensitive wild animals like the Blackhawks are disappearing.  When human numbers increase along the river, the Blackhawks will abandon their nest, and since there are few remaining quiet waterways in Arizona, those delightful fledgling flights could end forever.

Regulation of the Human Population

Population growth cycles occur because they produce negative feedbacks that limit numbers.  Growing populations consume resources and encourage growth of predator populations.  The same kinds of negative feedbacks will limit the human population.

It’s obvious how we reduce available resources by consuming them and by ruining them with our wastes.  Less obvious, but still familiar, is the way we enhance our predators.  Some plants have the ability to shed chemicals toxic to their herbivore predators.  However, if the plants produce the chemicals continuously, their predators can evolve tolerance to the chemicals.  Thus, the plants lose their defense and are eaten.  Humans enable disease predators by creating and continuously using antibiotics.  Like the plants, we enable evolution of tolerance among our disease predators.

There have been numerous analyses of historical collapses of human societies.  I like the analysis and predictions of our coming global collapse contained in the 1972 book, Limits to Growth.  Scientists recently reanalyzed the book’s research and concurred with the prediction that the first signs of collapse of human civilization will appear in 2020.  Here’s a summary of the research.

Limits To Growth Was Right.  Research Shows We’re Nearing Collapse

By:  Graham Turner and Cathy Alexander (

“The 1972 book Limits to Growth, which predicted our civilisation would probably collapse sometime this century, has been criticised as doomsday fantasy since it was published. Back in 2002, self-styled environmental expert Bjorn Lomborg consigned it to the “dustbin of history”.

“It doesn’t belong there. Research from the University of Melbourne has found the book’s forecasts are accurate, 40 years on. If we continue to track in line with the book’s scenario, expect the early stages of global collapse to start appearing soon.

“Limits to Growth was commissioned by a think tank called the Club of Rome. Researchers working out of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, including husband-and-wife team Donella and Dennis Meadows, built a computer model to track the world’s economy and environment. Called World3, this computer model was cutting edge.

“The task was very ambitious. The team tracked industrialisation, population, food, use of resources, and pollution. They modelled data up to 1970, then developed a range of scenarios out to 2100, depending on whether humanity took serious action on environmental and resource issues. If that didn’t happen, the model predicted “overshoot and collapse” – in the economy, environment and population – before 2070. This was called the “business-as-usual” scenario.

“The book’s central point, much criticised since, is that “the earth is finite” and the quest for unlimited growth in population, material goods etc would eventually lead to a crash.

“So were they right? We decided to check in with those scenarios after 40 years. Dr Graham Turner gathered data from the UN (its department of economic and social affairs, Unesco, the food and agriculture organisation, and the UN statistics yearbook). He also checked in with the US national oceanic and atmospheric administration, the BP statistical review, and elsewhere. That data was plotted alongside the Limits to Growth scenarios.

“The results show that the world is tracking pretty closely to the Limits to Growth “business-as-usual” scenario. The data doesn’t match up with other scenarios.

“These graphs show real-world data (first from the MIT work, then from our research), plotted in a solid line. The dotted line shows the Limits to Growth “business-as-usual” scenario out to 2100. Up to 2010, the data is strikingly similar to the book’s forecasts.  Graphs:  Faint and dotted lines, Limits to Growth “business-as-usual projections.  Heavy lines, the newly added data.

“As the MIT researchers explained in 1972, under the scenario, growing population and demands for matLimits-Populationerial wealth would lead to more industrial output and pollution. The graphs show this is indeed happening. Resources are being used up at a rapid rate, pollution is rising, industrial output and food per capita is rising. The population is rising quickly.

“So far, Limits to Growth checks out with reality. So what happens next?

“According to the book, to feed the continued growth in industrial output there must be ever-increasing use of resources. But resources become more expensive to obtain as they are used up. As more and more capital goes towards resource extraction, industrial output per capita starts to fall – in the book, from about 2015.

Limits-Environment“As pollution mounts and industrial input into agriculture falls, food production per capita falls. Health and education services are cut back, and that combines to bring about a rise in the death rate from about 2020. Global population begins to fall from about 2030, by about half a billion people per decade. Living conditions fall to levels similar to the early 1900s.

“It’s essentially resource constraints that bring about global collapse in the book. However, Limits to Growth does factor in the fallout from increasing pollution, including climate change. The book warned carbon dioxide emissions would have a “climatological effect” via “warming the atmosphere”.

“As the graphs show, the University of Melbourne research has not found proof of collapse as of 2010 (although growth has already stalled in some areas). But in Limits to Growth those effects only start to bite around 2015-2030.

Limits-Economy“The first stages of decline may already have started. The Global Financial Crisis of 2007-08 and ongoing economic malaise may be a harbinger of the fallout from resource constraints. The pursuit of material wealth contributed to unsustainable levels of debt, with suddenly higher prices for food and oil contributing to defaults – and the GFC.

“The issue of peak oil is critical. Many independent researchers conclude that “easy” conventional oil production has already peaked. Even the conservative International Energy Agency has warned about peak oil.

“Peak oil could be the catalyst for global collapse. Some see new fossil fuel sources like shale oil, tar sands and coal seam gas as saviours, but the issue is how fast these resources can be extracted, for how long, and at what cost. If they soak up too much capital to extract the fallout would be widespread.

“Our research does not indicate that collapse of the world economy, environment and population is a certainty. Nor do we claim the future will unfold exactly as the MIT researchers predicted back in 1972. Wars could break out; so could genuine global environmental leadership. Either could dramatically affect the trajectory.

“But our findings should sound an alarm bell. It seems unlikely that the quest for ever-increasing growth can continue unchecked to 2100 without causing serious negative effects – and those effects might come sooner than we think.

“It may be too late to convince the world’s politicians and wealthy elites to chart a different course. So to the rest of us, maybe it’s time to think about how we protect ourselves as we head into an uncertain future.

“As Limits to Growth concluded in 1972:  If the present growth trends in world population, industrialisation, pollution, food production, and resource depletion continue unchanged, the limits to growth on this planet will be reached sometime within the next one hundred years. The most probable result will be a rather sudden and uncontrollable decline in both population and industrial capacity.

“So far, there’s little to indicate they got that wrong”.

Will Global Warming Extinguish the Human Species?

The authors of The Limits to Growth did not anticipate the rapidity with which global warming would appear. Of many predictions the book contains, the one for atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2), based on the 20-year record of observations available at the time was surprisingly precise.  The graph on page 79 of The Limits to Growth shows Lester Machta’s CO2 level projections both forward and backward in time.

Most scientists agree that anything over 380 is dangerous.  The fear is that somewhere on the way to 550 ppm we will pass critical points after which continental ice masses will melt, radically altering climate and causing a large increase in sea level.  The July 17, 2016 level is 404.74; and already the ice has started melting, storms and floods are intensifying, the oceans are warming, and lethal heat waves are expanding.

The human population’s resource use and pollution have already had catastrophic effects on Earth ecosystems.  Those effects will continue to increase, but by 2100, global warming’s impact will become greater than all the others combined.

Most species survive their boom and bust population cycles.  However, the combination of resource exhaustion, antibiotic resistant diseases, pollution, and global warming might do more than reduce our population.  It might rub us out.

We’ve Had the Boom.  Can We Avoid the Bust?

InfernoMany people recognize the dangers of the human population explosion.  In his recent novel, Inferno, Dan Brown’s villain says, “Here I stand with the head of the World Health Organization—the best the WHO has to offer.  A terrifying thought if you consider it.  I have shown you this image of impending misery.”  He refreshed the screen, again displaying the bodies.  “I have reminded you of the awesome power of unchecked population growth.”  He pointed to his small stack of paper.  “I have enlightened you about the fact that we are on the brink of a spiritual collapse.”  He paused and turned directly toward her.  “And your response?  Free condoms in Africa.”  The man gave a derisive sneer.  “This is like swinging a flyswatter at an incoming asteroid.”—Dan Brown.  2013.  “Inferno, a novel.”  Doubleday, New York, page 104.

Other SciFi novels deal with the human impact on the Earth and many are devoted to human experience after a collapse.  In the world of applied science, numerous private and public organizations are trying to find reasonable ways to control our population.  Here’s one example.

Center for Biological Diversity (CBD) Work on Population

CBD.–“Human population growth and overconsumption are at the root of our most pressing environmental issues, including the species extinction crisis, habitat loss and climate change. To save wildlife and wild places, we use creative media and public outreach to raise awareness about runaway human population growth and unsustainable consumption — and their close link to the endangerment of other species.

“There are more than 7 billion people on the planet, and we’re adding 227,000 more every day. The toll on wildlife is impossible to miss: Species are disappearing 1,000 to 10,000 times faster than the natural rate. It’s clear that these issues need to be addressed before it’s too late.

About Our (CBD) Population and Sustainability Work

“The Center has been working to address the connection between rampant human population growth and the extinction crisis since 2009. Our innovative outreach and public-pressure campaigns — like our award-winning Endangered Species Condoms project — focus on common-sense solutions, including the empowerment of women and girls, the education of all people, universal access to birth control, sustainable consumer choices, and a societal commitment to giving all species a chance to live and thrive.”  Continue reading:  Population and Sustainability.

Follow this link for a list of other population organizations.

Is Human Extinction Inevitable?

Without global warming, our resource consumption and environmental pollution would have brought about a collapse from which we could recover, smarter and stronger.  However, global warming has made recovery uncertain.  Glaciers and polar ice caps are melting, sea level is rising, the oceans are warming and becoming acidic, and the weather–heat waves, storms, droughts, and fires–is getting worse.  For insightful analyses of these consequences of global warming, go to Robert Fanney’s blog.  It’s too late to prevent the coming disasters, but if we could stop population growth, fossil fuel burning, road and building construction, and meat consumption today, we might limit the size of the disasters and insure our species’ survival.  Of course, we’re not going to stop today.

Nevertheless, I find it hard to believe that humans will become extinct.  Though the coming hardships will exceed the ice ages and anything else we’ve experienced, we are so widely distributed and so adaptable, some of us could survive.  We may decline to small bands picking over Earth’s wasted ecosystems, but even the citizens of Mad Max’s dystopian Earth had a future.  And so might we.

5 thoughts on “Human Population Cycle

  1. Reblogged this on The Secular Jurist and commented:

    “As Limits to Growth concluded in 1972: If the present growth trends in world population, industrialisation, pollution, food production, and resource depletion continue unchanged, the limits to growth on this planet will be reached sometime within the next one hundred years. The most probable result will be a rather sudden and uncontrollable decline in both population and industrial capacity.

    “So far, there’s little to indicate they got that wrong”.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Ever since I can remember I’ve been constantly anxious about humans’ use of resources, and always wondering why no-one else seemed to share this worry, which is like a constantly nagging toothache. Standing in some store looking at the completely unnecessary goods for sale, and imagining their stocks multiplied millions of times over around the world. It’s amazing that we haven’t depleted everything already. But we are doing such appalling damage. I think I would rather the human race did go extinct, and then there would be hope for the planet!

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Only a few people have your sensitivity. School children hear about conservation–wildlife, soil, water, etc.–but the lessons are eclipsed by our consumer culture, and they’re definitely not something our “growth at all costs” leaders would discuss.


  4. Pingback: Deforestation: $906B At Risk Via ‘Domino Effect’ On The Supply Chain | GarryRogers Nature Conservation

  5. Pingback: Call For Population Papers: Spring 2018 | GarryRogers Nature Conservation


Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.