Livestock and Humans Have Replaced Most Wild Animals

GR: In this study, the investigators analyzed global biomass, a common measure of animal and plant abundance, to estimate changes in the abundance of organisms. They found that humans and livestock account for 96% of all vertebrates on Earth. Previous global estimates have used numbers, not biomass, to estimate abundance. The results agree, but the new study was able to extend estimates farther back in history. Both approaches conclude that more than half of all animals have been lost since 1970. The investigators in the new study found that since human civilisation arose, 83% of wild mammals have disappeared.

The Guardian added excellent graphics to illustrate the research findings.  Highly recommended!

A cattle feedlot in Mato Grosso, Brazil. 60% of all mammals on Earth are livestock. Photograph: Daniel Beltra, Greenpeace

“Humankind is revealed as simultaneously insignificant and utterly dominant in the grand scheme of life on Earth by a groundbreaking new assessment of all life on the planet.

“The world’s 7.6 billion people represent just 0.01% of all living things, according to the study. Yet since the dawn of civilisation, humanity has caused the loss of 83% of all wild mammals and half of plants, while livestock kept by humans abounds.

“The new work is the first comprehensive estimate of the weight of every class of living creature and overturns some long-held assumptions. Bacteria are indeed a major life form – 13% of everything – but plants overshadow everything, representing 82% of all living matter. All other creatures, from insects to fungi, to fish and animals, make up just 5% of the world’s biomass.

“Another surprise is that the teeming life revealed in the oceans by the recent BBC television series Blue Planet II turns out to represent just 1% of all biomass. The vast majority of life is land-based and a large chunk – an eighth – is bacteria buried deep below the surface.

“I was shocked to find there wasn’t already a comprehensive, holistic estimate of all the different components of biomass,” said Prof Ron Milo, at the Weizmann Institute of Science in Israel, who led the work, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

“I would hope this gives people a perspective on the very dominant role that humanity now plays on Earth,” he said, adding that he now chooses to eat less meat due to the huge environmental impact of livestock” –Damian Carrington, The Guardian.


6 thoughts on “Livestock and Humans Have Replaced Most Wild Animals

  1. These numbers are crazy and impossible to comprehend! These are such unpleasant topics too. It is overwhelming saddening to see what is happening to the World. Even where we seem to be ‘improving’ or ‘greening’ the world, it is so contrary of what is needed. So many people believe that we can partly ‘fix’ ecological disaster by planting more trees, when in fact, there are more trees in places like San Jose and Los Angeles than there are naturally, and that they actually interfere with ecology (not that it will stop me from planting trees.)

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Most of what we do is not well designed to advance or conserve natural systems. But many of the problems stem from general ignorance. For instance, I noticed today that nowhere in the the long list of causes the U. S. Progressive politicians have adopted appears the word population. No surprise, but truly surprising that extinction and biodiversity aren’t mentioned either. It is disheartening.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. ‘Disheartening’ is a good (or very bad) word for it. It all seems to be so hopeless. I know I should not talk like that. I should be finding a way to capitalize on it like so many others do. I happen to like planting trees to beautify Los Angeles and other urban areas, but I know it does not fix anything in the big picture. Sorry about that. I happen to live in the redwood forests of the Santa Cruz Mountains. Even here, we have crazy ‘environmentalists’ wanting to protect the invasive exotic species just because they are alive. Besides that, it is a good place to enjoy a bit of forest and try to pretend that everything is fine with it.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Pingback: I had a preview of our devastating effects on the life of other living species on the book “Homo Sapiens” (Y. N. Harari), here some scientific evidence of it… “Livestock and Humans Have Replaced Most Wild Animals” — GarryRo

  5. Pingback: I had a preview of our devastating effects on the lives of other living species on the book “Homo Sapiens” (Y. N. Harari), here some scientific evidence of it… “Livestock and Humans Have Replaced Most Wild Animals” — GarryR

  6. Pingback: Who are we? Where and how do we want to live and let others live? What are we doing to ourselves, our loved ones and the ones we don’t know yet? – Ninfa de los Andes


Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.