Transportation Adaptation to Climate Change

Without radical climate-change adaptations, movement of people and goods will soon become severely limited. Recent studies estimate that climate-related damage to transportation infrastructure could exceed $1 trillion by 2050. #ClimateAdaptation #TransportResilience

Transforming Transportation for a Changing World

The accelerating deterioration of Earth’s biosphere demands fundamental changes in how we approach transportation. From coastal infrastructure threatened by rising seas to rail lines buckling under extreme heat, our existing transportation systems face mounting challenges that require innovative solutions and comprehensive adaptation strategies.

Climate Impacts on Infrastructure

The scale of climate impacts on transportation infrastructure is staggering. Research by the American Society of Civil Engineers projects that climate-related damages will surpass $1 trillion by 2050 (ASCE 2021). Coastal transportation networks are particularly vulnerable, with studies indicating that up to 60% of coastal infrastructure will face risks from sea-level rise and storm surges by 2100 (Dawson et al. 2016).

Heat impacts present another critical challenge. Extreme temperatures cause rail buckling and road surface degradation, leading to billions in annual repair costs. Chinowsky et al. (2019) estimate that heat-related damage to transportation infrastructure will become a major economic burden by mid-century.

Innovative Materials and Design Solutions

To address these challenges, engineers are developing climate-resilient materials and adaptive design approaches. The Arizona Department of Transportation’s pioneering use of rubber-modified asphalt demonstrates the potential of advanced materials to enhance infrastructure stability (Rodezno et al. 2020).

The Netherlands offers another inspiring example with their innovative floating roads concept, enabling transportation infrastructure to adjust to changing water levels (Rijkswaterstaat 2018). Such flexible design approaches will become increasingly crucial as environmental conditions become more volatile.

Alternative Transportation Methods

Diversifying transportation options strengthens system resilience. Electric and hydrogen-powered vehicles represent a crucial step toward reducing fossil fuel dependence while integrating with renewable energy systems. Norway’s rapid transition to electric vehicles demonstrates the feasibility of large-scale transportation electrification (Norwegian EV Association 2021).

Active transportation infrastructure, particularly walking and cycling networks, provides low-carbon mobility options that remain functional during energy disruptions. Copenhagen’s extensive bicycle infrastructure network exemplifies climate-resilient urban transportation (City of Copenhagen 2019).

Supply Chain Adaptations

The resilience of supply chains becomes increasingly critical as environmental conditions deteriorate. Distributed storage facilities and flexible routing systems enhance supply chain stability. Amazon’s network of fulfillment centers illustrates the potential of distributed logistics (Hoberg and Alicke 2019).

Local production and shorter supply chains reduce vulnerability to transportation disruptions. The concept of “smart specialization” in regional economies can enhance stability while maintaining efficiency (Foray 2018).

Urban and Rural Considerations

Urban transportation systems require focused adaptation due to high population density and infrastructure concentration. Transit-oriented development reduces transportation vulnerability while improving accessibility. Singapore’s integration of land use and transportation planning serves as a model for resilient urban mobility (Meng et al. 2018).

Rural areas face unique challenges, including dispersed populations and limited resources. Queensland, Australia’s flood-resistant road design guidelines offer valuable insights for rural adaptation (Queensland Government 2019). Alternative access methods, such as small aircraft and autonomous vehicles, become vital for remote areas.

Emergency Transportation Planning

As environmental disruptions increase, emergency transportation planning becomes critical. Florida’s evacuation planning system provides valuable lessons for large-scale population movements (Florida Division of Emergency Management 2021). The United Nations Humanitarian Response Depot network highlights the importance of pre-positioned transportation resources (UNHRD 2020).

Conclusion

Reviewing the literature on transportation adaptation gives one the same old “too little too late” feeling. The 200-year minimum planning period is not being applied. If it were, the worst-case prospects would generate much stronger preparations. (I included more discussion of this issue in Silent Earth (Rogers 2025). The Kindle version is free on Amazon today and tomorrow.)

References

ASCE. 2021. Infrastructure report card: Transportation. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston.

City of Copenhagen. 2019. Copenhagen bicycle account 2018. Technical and Environmental Administration, Copenhagen.

Chinowsky P, et al. 2019. Infrastructure adaptation to climate change: Dynamic adaptation pathways for road infrastructure. Climate Risk Management 23: 76-93.

Dawson D, et al. 2016. On the potential for climate change impacts on marine infrastructure. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers 169(4): 167-178.

Florida Division of Emergency Management. 2021. State of Florida comprehensive emergency management plan. Florida Division of Emergency Management, Tallahassee.

Foray D. 2018. Smart specialization strategies and industrial modernization in European regions—theory and practice. Cambridge Journal of Economics 42(6): 1505-1520.

Hoberg K, Alicke K. 2019. Five lessons for supply chains from the COVID-19 crisis. McKinsey & Company, New York.

Meng M, et al. 2018. Transit-oriented development in an urban rail transportation corridor. Transportation Research Part B 118: 231-247.

Norwegian EV Association. 2021. Norwegian EV policy. Norwegian EV Association, Oslo.

Queensland Government. 2019. Flood Resistant Road Design Guidelines. Department of Transport and Main Roads.

Rijkswaterstaat. 2018. Floating Roads: Innovation in Dutch Water Management. Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management.

Rodezno MC, et al. 2020. Development of a nanomaterial for use in pavements to reduce the urban heat island effect. Transportation Research Record 2674(10): 617-627.

Rogers, G. 2025. Silent Earth: Adaptations for life in a devasted biosphere. Coldwater Press, Humboldt, AZ. 452 p.

UNHRD. 2020. Annual Report 2020. United Nations Humanitarian Response Depot, Geneva.

USA poll finds renewable energy favoured far more than coal, gas, nuclear power

“Energy efficiency, renewable energy rules favored by voters, poll finds, Cleveland.com By John Funk, The Plain Dealer on September 05, 2014 COLUMBUS, Ohio – Ohio voters favor the state’s renewable energy and energy efficiency mandates that Republican lawmakers just put on ice for two years, a new poll suggests.”

“Commissioned by a coalition of environmental groups and conducted jointly by two national polling companies, one which works for Republican candidates and the other for Democratic candidates, the poll interviewed 405 registered Ohio voters and has a margin of error of 4.9 percent.

“The survey found that voters would favor political candidates by a two-to-one margin who favor more wind and solar energy development over those who think the state’s reliance on coal, gas and nuclear power is adequate. A total of 64 percent favored the green candidates while only 31 percent said they would be more likely to vote for candidates supporting traditional energy production.

“The poll also found that 69 percent of voters would favor candidates who believe requiring electric utilities to help customers use less electricity would save ratepayers money, while just 23 percent would vote for candidates who argue that such mandated efficiency programs cost ratepayers more than they save.”

By John Funk, The Plain Dealer 

Source: nuclear-news.net

GR:  Of course, most politicians side with corporations, not voters.

Wind Energy Now Cheaper than Coal

Source:  RobertScribbler

Running the world on renewable energy.

“If you listen to the fossil fuel cheerleaders, the possibility is more remote than ever. Earlier this month, a few oil and natural gas fracking boosters in the EU derided the high cost of energy in Europe. They claimed that shifting to a policy of climate and groundwater threatening fracking could free them from both energy price shock and dependence on threatening overseas powers like Russia.

GE Wind Turbine with Battery Back-up

(GE wind turbine with battery backup in the turbine housing stores power for times of peak demand or when the wind is not blowing. Image source: Smart Planet.)

“Unfortunately, such, unattached-to-reality, fossil fuel boosting by former industry professionals turned politician isn’t new. For these wayward ministers had missed recent developments in nearby Denmark providing a real long-term solution to both high energy prices and dependence on foreign suppliers, and all without the added hassle of threatening Europe’s water supplies or pushing the world one step closer to climate change game over.

Cheaper Than Other Forms of Energy

For according to a recent report from the government of Denmark, new wind power coming online in 2016 will cost half that of energy now provided from current coal and natural gas based power plants. The net price would be equal to 5.4 cents (US) per kilowatt hour.

Rasmus Petersen, Danish Minister for Energy, Climate and Buildings was far more sanguine than a number of his wayward peers regarding renewable’s prospects:

“Wind power today is cheaper than other forms of energy, not least because of a big commitment and professionalism in the field. This is true both for researchers, companies and politicians.”

“We need a long-term and stable energy policy to ensure that renewable energy, both today and in the future is the obvious choice.”

Read more at RobertScribbler