In a candid December 2025 appearance on the program Climate Chat, climatologist James Hansen spoke plainly regarding the state of global climate communication. He described the scientific community’s current posture not merely as cautious, but as “scientific reticence on steroids”. Hansen argued that the persistent political narrative, that global warming can still be limited to 1.5°C via net-zero emissions by 2050, is “hogwash,” explicitly stating that such a figure “exposes too much” about the widening gap between official goals and physical reality. He noted greenhouse gas forcing is still increasing, making the 1.5°C target physically implausible without massive, immediate interventions that go far beyond current commitments.
This urgent warning serves as the catalyst for the deep-dive essay, Epistemic Reticence and the Structural Underestimation of Catastrophic Climate Risk. While Hansen sounds the alarm on the immediate data, the essay investigates the deep-seated structural and sociological reasons such warnings are routinely muffled. It explores the “Erring on the Side of Least Drama” (ESLD) hypothesis, which suggests scientists are culturally predisposed to downplay extreme risks to avoid accusations of alarmism. It examines how the IPCC’s requirement for consensus acts as a structural filter, often excising the “fat tails” of probability distributions, the very worst-case scenarios that Hansen warns we are ignoring.
If Hansen is right, and reticence has indeed gone too far, understanding the machinery of this silence is no longer just an academic exercise, it is a survival imperative. The essay attempts to dismantle that machinery to show exactly how and why we underestimate the risk of ruin.
The biggest threat to life on Earth is the massive damage to the biosphere by humans. This damage comes from our heavy resource use, waste production, and severe global warming.
Human actions are pushing natural systems past their limits (Rogers 2025). This causes mass extinctions and loss of vital life support systems. The endless drive for economic growth is unsustainable. “A great change in our stewardship of the Earth is required. . .” (Ripple et al. 2017, Rogers 2026b). James Lovelock warned that overheating the planet is the single greatest danger to our world. He stated, “I cannot say too strongly that the greatest threat to life on Earth is overheating” (Lovelock 2019, 57).
Most scientists doubt we can limit the global average temperature rise to 2o C. But even if we do, our damage to the biosphere will still be catastrophic. Even if we stop greenhouse emissions, it will take centuries for climate to stabilize at the new warmer level (Rogers 2026a). Moreover, if the human population remains in the billions, the damage we cause will keep growing. Here are some of the human wrought environmental changes that have already occurred or will begin to occur over the next 10-20 years.
The ongoing loss of plant and animal species is breaking the living webs that support productivity and stability of the natural world (Richardson et al. 2023).
Clearing forests and livestock grazing are destroying wild habitats, contributing to extinction, and ruining the healthy soils needed to support natural ecosystems and agriculture (Steffen et al. 2015).
Human impacts on ecosystem networks break the Earth’s cognitive web that facilitates high biosphere diversity and productivity. This limits resources available to the technosphere and human cultural and social systems (Frank, Grinspoon, and Walker 2022, Milanese 2025). By destroying the microbiome with chemical fertilizers, deforestation, overgrazing, and more, we break the natural connections that create the environment that supports life (Gajbhiye 2025, Handte-Reinecker and Sardeshpande 2025).
Flooding the environment with nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers creates huge dead zones in our ponds, lakes, and oceans that kill aquatic life (Carpenter and Bennett 2011).
Draining our rivers and underground aquifers to irrigate crops and run our cities removes the fresh water required by natural ecosystems and will empty the people from many large cities (Gleeson et al. 2020).
Rising seas will increase salinity of lowlands, destroy coastal ecosystems, and displace hundreds of millions of people worldwide (Hansen et al. 2013).
The increase of extreme weather events severely disrupts natural ecosystems, reduces the yields of crucial agricultural crops (Malhi et al. 2020), and damages critical energy and transport infrastructure (Forzieri et al., 2018).
Warming seas combine with acidification from fertilizer runoff and CO2 absorption from the air to cause tropical coral reefs to die (Doney et al. 2009). Abundance of marine life is falling (Zahid et al. 2025) in a catastrophic loss of food for coastal communities.
Industry, transportation, deforestation, farming, and desertification release soot and dust particles into the air, blocking sunlight and disrupting the rain patterns needed by natural ecosystems and human farms (Ramanathan et al. 2001).
Toxic chemicals and plastics released into the environment poison the bodies of living things and damages the health of the entire global ecosystem (Persson et al. 2022).
Air pollution causes breaks in the ozone layer and increases harmful solar radiation that causes cancer in humans and damages plant genetics (Solomon 2019).
Irreversible tipping points have been or will be passed (Lenton et al. 2008). Here is a list of some of them:
The Greenland Ice Sheet will slowly and permanently melt raising global sea levels by many meters (Boers and Rypdal 2021).
The Amazon rainforest will die out.
The West Antarctic Ice Sheet will fall apart and slide into the ocean causing massive coastal flooding for centuries (DeConto and Pollard 2016).
Warm, acidic ocean waters will bleach and kill tropical coral reefs around the world, resulting in a devastating loss of diversity and productivity of marine sea life (Dixon et al. 2022).
Rapid melting of northern permafrost will release huge amounts of trapped carbon creating even more global heating (Turetsky et al. 2020).
The Barents Sea will rapidly lose its winter sea ice disrupting northern ecosystems and weather patterns (Onarheim et al. 2018).
Mountain glaciers will melt away shrinking essential drinking water supplies for lowland ecosystems and human communities (Hugonnet et al. 2021).
The ocean currents in the Labrador Sea will break down and cause major weather shifts across the North Atlantic region (Armstrong McKay et al. 2022).
References
Armstrong McKay, David I., Arie Staal, Jesse F. Abrams, Ricarda Winkelmann, Boris Sakschewski, Sina Loriani, Ingo Fetzer, Sarah E. Cornell, Johan Rockström, and Timothy M. Lenton. 2022. Exceeding 1.5 C global warming could trigger multiple climate tipping points. Science 377 (6611): eabn7950. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abn7950
Boers, Niklas, and Martin Rypdal. 2021. Critical slowing down suggests that the western Greenland Ice Sheet is close to a tipping point. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118 (21): e2024192118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2024192118
Carpenter, Stephen R., and Elena M. Bennett. 2011. Reconsideration of the planetary boundary for phosphorus. Environmental Research Letters 6 (1): 014009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/6/1/014009
DeConto, Robert M., and David Pollard. 2016. Contribution of Antarctica to past and future sea-level rise. Nature 531 (7596): 591-597. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17145
Dixon, Adele M., Piers M. Forster, Scott F. Heron, Anne M. K. Stoner, and Maria Beger. 2022. Future loss of local-scale thermal refugia in coral reef ecosystems. PLOS Climate 1 (2): e0000004. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000004
Doney, Scott C., Victoria J. Fabry, Richard A. Feely, and Joan A. Kleypas. 2009. Ocean acidification: The other CO2 problem. Annual Review of Marine Science 1: 169-192. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.marine.010908.163834
Forzieri, G., Bianchi, A., Silva, F. B. e., et al. (2018). Escalating impacts of climate extremes on critical infrastructures in Europe. Global Environmental Change, 48, 97-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.11.007
Frank, Adam, David Grinspoon, and Sara Walker. 2022. Intelligence as a planetary scale process. International Journal of Astrobiology 21 (2): 47-61. https://doi.org/10.1017/S147355042100029X
Gleeson, Tom, Lan Wang-Erlandsson, Samuel C. Zipper, Miina Porkka, Fernando Jaramillo, Dieter Gerten, Ingo Fetzer, et al. 2020. The water planetary boundary: Interrogation and revision. One Earth 2 (3): 223-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2020.02.009
Handte-Reinecker, Anna, and Mallika Sardeshpande. 2025. Microbiomes as Modulators of Human and Planetary Health: A Relational and Cross-Scale Perspective. Global Change Biology 31 (4): e70152. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.70152
Hansen, J., Kharecha, P., Sato, M., et al. (2013). Assessing Dangerous Climate Change: Required Reduction of Carbon Emissions to Protect Young People, Future Generations and Nature. PLoS ONE, 8, e81648. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0081648
Hugonnet, Romain, Romain McNabb, Etienne Berthier, Brian H. Menounos, Christopher Nuth, Andreas Kaab, and Daniel Farinotti. 2021. Accelerated global glacier mass loss in the early twenty-first century. Nature 592 (7856): 726-731. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03436-z
Lenton, T. M., Held, H., Kriegler, E., et al. (2008). Tipping elements in the Earth’s climate system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 1786-1793. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0705414105
Lovelock, James. 2019. Novacene: The Coming Age of Hyperintelligence. London: Allen Lane.
Malhi, Y., Franklin, J., Seddon, N., et al. (2020). Climate change and ecosystems: threats, opportunities and solutions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 375, 20190104. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0104
Onarheim, Ingrid H., Tor Eldevik, Lars H. Smedsrud, and Julienne C. Stroeve. 2018. Seasonal and regional manifestation of Arctic sea ice loss. Journal of Climate 31 (12): 4917-4932. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0427.1
Rogers, Garry. 2025. Silent Earth. Agua Fria Open Space Alliance, Coldwater Press, Humboldt, AZ. 551 p.
Rogers, Garry. 2026a. Biosphere Collapse. Agua Fria Open Space Alliance, Coldwater Press, Humboldt, AZ. 259 p.
Rogers, Garry. 2026b. Manifesto of the Initiation. Agua Fria Open Space Alliance, Coldwater Press, Humboldt, AZ. 28 p.
Persson, Linn, Bethanie M. Carney Almroth, Christopher D. Collins, Sarah Cornell, Cynthia A. de Wit, Miriam L. Diamond, Peter Fantke, et al. 2022. Outside the safe operating space of the planetary boundary for novel entities. Environmental Science & Technology 56 (3): 1510-1521. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c04158
Ramanathan, Veerabhadran, Paul J. Crutzen, Jeffrey T. Kiehl, and Daniel Rosenfeld. 2001. Aerosols, climate, and the hydrological cycle. Science 294 (5549): 2119-2124. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1064034
Richardson, Katherine, Will Steffen, Wolfgang Lucht, Jørgen Bendtsen, Sarah E. Cornell, Jonathan F. Donges, Ingo Fetzer, et al. 2023. Earth beyond six of nine planetary boundaries. Science Advances 9 (37): eadh2458. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adh2458
Ripple, William J., Christopher Wolf, Thomas M. Newsome, Mauro Galetti, Mohammed Alamgir, Eileen Crist, Mahmoud I. Mahmoud, and William F. Laurance. 2017: 1026. World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice. BioScience 67 (12): 1026-1028. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/bix125
Steffen, Will, Katherine Richardson, Johan Rockström, Sarah E. Cornell, Ingo Fetzer, Elena M. Bennett, Reinette Biggs, et al. 2015. Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 347 (6223): 1259855. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855
Turetsky, Merritt R., Benjamin W. Abbott, Katey M. Walter Anthony, John C. Schuur, Paul T. Mann, Christopher C. Treat, Susan M. Natali, et al. 2020. Carbon release through abrupt permafrost thaw. Nature Geoscience 13 (2): 138-143. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-019-0526-0
Zahid, F., Gajdzik, L., Korsmeyer, K. E., et al. (2025). Asynchronous effects of heat stress on growth rates of massive corals and damselfish in the Red Sea. PLOS ONE, 20, e0316247. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0316247
In 1974, a fire burned through the vegetation along Dead Man Wash in the Sonoran Desert uplands north of Phoenix, AZ. Giant Saguaro cacti were scattered along the wash. Between them grew diverse native perennials adapted to arid conditions over millions of years.
Fifty years of monitoring revealed what happened next.
After the fire, invasive annual grasses established and spread, creating continuous fuel beds where none existed before. Fire frequency increased throughout the desert and each fire killed fire-sensitive natives. Without the diseases and consumers of their Asian homeland, the invasive grasses soon created a continuous carpet of fine fuel where none had exted before.
A feedback loop emerged: more grass, more fuel, more fire, more native mortality, more open ground, more grass, etc. The system crossed a threshold and reorganized in a new stable state. The Saguaros did not bounce back. They vanished.
Left: Common scene in the Arizona Upland of the Sonoran Desert. Right: The new scene spreading across the deseert.
To a visitor encountering the site today, the weedy landscape appears normal. The memory of the Saguaro forest has been erased.
This pattern repeats across every biome on Earth. The Amazon is savannizing. Coral reefs are shifting to algal dominance. Some changes cannot be undone. Restoration would require immense, unattainable financing and has become an obsolete concept.
Aldo Leopold wrote in 1949 that we abuse land because we see it as commodity. When we see it as our community to which we belong, we tend to use it with more respect.
Becoming a “plain member and citizen” of the biosphere means relinquishing exceptionalism. We are not the rulers of Earth. We are one species among millions. We are participants in an ancient web of relationships, nodes in the biosphere’s cognitive community.
Acceptance requires the demise of the industrial ego. We must realize that we do not stand apart from nature. Technological prowess allows us to use and wreck planetary systems, but we need those systems to survive. The contemporary industrial ego with its desire for eternal growth permeates modern consciousness so thoroughly that alternatives seem impossible. Yet it is hubris. It is a recent development enabled by fossil fuel abundance. It will not survive the thermodynamic correction now underway.
What emerges from the correction does not have to be humanity’s diminishment it could be our fulfillment. Our intelligence can mature into sapience. We need not reject civilization but right-size it to sustainable scale.
Three principles define the shift from adolescence to maturity, from destroyer to steward.
Ecocentricity means rejecting the view that nature exists for human utility. It means recognizing intrinsic value throughout the biosphere. Rivers have worth independent of irrigation potential. Forests matter beyond timber value. Species deserve protection not for ecosystem services but because they exist. New Zealand’s Whanganui River, granted legal personhood in 2017, embodies this principle in law.
Interdependence means acknowledging that no organism exists alone. The illusion of independence proves strong in urban societies, where food appears in supermarkets and water flows from taps. Ecology shows this illusion is fiction. Every organism depends on countless others. Human wellbeing requires biosphere wellbeing.
Reciprocity means moving from extraction to exchange. Industrial civilization takes resources, produces goods, and discards waste while the biosphere receives nothing in return except degradation. Reciprocity asks not only what we can extract but what we can contribute to ecosystem health. This is partnership, not parasitism.
Together, these principles transform the human-biosphere relationship from exploitation to citizenship.
Humans possess something no other species has: the capacity to think about our own thinking.
We can identify our biases and design systems to counteract them. We can study collapsed civilizations and extract lessons applicable today. We can model futures and change course before critical impacts. We can consciously direct cultural evolution rather than stumbling through it blindly.
This metacognitive capacity is the ultimate human adaptation. Chimpanzees solve problems but cannot design institutions to overcome their cognitive limitations. Dolphins communicate but cannot write histories documenting their mistakes. Only humans can anticipate distant futures and deliberately choose to evolve.
Cognitive adaptation means recognizing that optimism bias, temporal discounting, and shifting baselines are not character flaws but universal features of human information processing. It means building governance systems that account for these biases rather than assuming rational actors. It means cultivating ecological consciousness through direct nature experience, systems education, and intergenerational knowledge transfer.
The transformation from conqueror to citizen is no longer just an ideal. It is a survival strategy. The ultimate test of human intelligence will be our ability to live wisely on Earth.
We refused to mature through foresight. Now we must mature through catastrophe.
This is not punishment. It is pedagogy. The floods, fires, famines, and extinctions are initiatory ordeals—the only teachers capable of piercing frameworks that voluntary learning could not penetrate.
Developmental psychology reveals the pattern. Adolescents often require painful experiences to accept realities they have intellectually ignored. Warnings prove insufficient. The crash teaches what caution could not. The loss instructs where abundance taught nothing.
Philosopher Glen Albrecht named the grief following the ecological losses paralleling our carelessness “solastalgia.” This is the distress caused by transformation of familiar places. Climate scientists report psychological anguish from witnessing planetary degradation. Farmers mourn disappearing seasons. Children express anxiety about futures they feel have been stolen.
This grief serves essential function. It breaks through cognitive barriers—optimism bias, shifting baselines, strategic ignorance—that insulate consciousness from environmental truth. Direct experience of loss penetrates defenses that data cannot.
The tragic irony is clear. The cognitive biases preventing voluntary transformation ensure that transformation will come through suffering. The teachers arrive uninvited, bearing lessons no one wants.
Industrial civilization runs on a one-time inheritance. Fossil fuels represent millions of years of accumulated sunlight, compressed and concentrated by geological processes. We are burning in centuries what took eons to form.
This is the carbon pulse, an artificial monsoon that allowed extraordinary population growth and technological development. Under its influence, we built complexity far beyond what sustainable energy flows could support. We constructed global supply chains, sprawling cities, and fragile just-in-time systems on the assumption that the rain would never stop.
But pulses end. Monsoons cease.
Energy Return on Energy Invested tells the story. Early oil wells delivered 100 barrels for every barrel invested in extraction. Modern unconventional sources fall below 10 to 1. As easily accessible reserves deplete, the surplus enabling complex civilization shrinks.
Historian Joseph Tainter showed complex societies require continuous energy surplus to maintain. When that surplus declines, complexity becomes unsustainable. The system sheds expensive structures to survive.
Physics does not negotiate. The thermodynamic correction is not a policy choice. It is the universe balancing the books.
The adolescent brain possesses adult capacities for reasoning and manipulation but lacks mature judgment. The adolescent believes themselves invincible, resists external constraints, and prioritizes immediate desires over long-term consequences.
Industrial civilization exhibits these same symptoms.
Omnipotence fantasies drive our faith in technological salvation. We will engineer our way out of climate change. We will replace depleted fisheries with aquaculture. We will escape Earth’s limits by colonizing Mars. The pattern is not confidence, but denial dressed as optimism.
Immediate gratification structures our economies. Quarterly earnings drive corporate decisions. Election cycles shape political priorities. The long-term becomes invisible. We extract concentrated energy accumulated over millions of years, enjoying abundance now while externalizing costs to future generations.
Rebellion against limits defines our response to ecological boundaries. We treat constraints not as laws of physics but as challenges to overcome. Soil depletion? More fertilizer. Water scarcity? Deeper wells. Climate change? Air conditioning.
The adolescent is not evil for being immature. But the adolescent must eventually grow up—or face the consequences of perpetual juvenility.
