Beetle vs. Bird: Expert Panel Weighs in on Biocontrol of Invasive Tamarisk Trees

Anna Sher Simon:  “Tamarisk was introduced to the Western U.S. from Eurasia in the late 1800s, and over the next 50 years it was widely planted as a fast-growing, drought-resistant ornamental and riverbank stabilizer.  However, the negative impacts of the tree were increasingly evident, leading to the passage of a national bill to address the issue.”  Source: www.huffingtonpost.com

GR:  Tamarisk became invasive, replacing native plants, and sucking up lots of water that people wanted.  It also became home to an endangered bird species.  An introduced beetle effectively kills the tree, but also eliminates the endangered bird’s habitat.  What to do.

Land managers conclude:  “Our primary task, therefore, is to promote desirable replacement vegetation whenever and wherever we can, taking advantage of the opportunity the beetles create and mitigating any unintended effects. The panelists’ report, expected this spring, is a first step in that direction.”

WELL DUH. Why weren’t restoration and unintended effects considered in the first place?  In many similar instances of “land-use management,” the U.  S. Bureau of Land Management, and most other public land-management agencies, fail to plan ahead.  They praise “adaptive management,” and then do not collect the necessary information.  They just don’t look before they leap, and they don’t look back to see why their shoes stink.

Comments:

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.