Tell USDA and President Obama to Stop Dow Chemical’s “Agent Orange” Crops

Stop Dow Chemical’s “Agent Orange” Crops

Over a hundred million additional pounds of toxic pesticides associated with cancers and birth defects are coming to a field near you. UNLESS YOU STOP IT!

“Agent Orange” crops are genetically engineered by Dow Chemical to promote the use of 2,4-D, one of the herbicides in the toxic mixture Vietnam veteran’s know as Agent Orange. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) is on the cusp of approval, even though they acknowledge the use of this toxic pesticide will skyrocket.
There is a 30-day public comment period and it MIGHT BE OUR LAST CHANCE to stop this chemical assault – Sign the petition today!

GR:  The dangers of pesticides are pervasive and worth repeating. Weed managers spray millions of gallons of pesticides on crops, along roads, and in parks. The U. S. Bureau of Land Management uses pesticides throughout the public lands of the 17 western U. S. states. The farm upstream from my home has weed-free zones that are probably maintained by pesticides. Bees serving as pollinators on the farm catch a full dose. Bees in yards and gardens downstream from the farm receive small doses that washed off the farm into the stream and into the groundwater. When home gardeners respond to the massive pesticide marketing efforts and use pesticides around their homes, they easily reach lethal levels.

 

EPA Forced to Study Pesticide Impacts on Endangered Species

“Legal settlement requires agency to analyze effects of 5 common pesticides Staff Report FRISCO — Under legal pressure from conservation advocates, the EPA last week agreed to take a hard look at how five commonly used pesticides affect endangered animals across the U.S.”

“One of the pesticides is carbaryl, commonly used in massive quantities in Colorado to try and protect trees from bark beetles. The other pesticides to be reviewed are chlorpyrifos, diazinon, malathion and methomyl. All have all been found to be toxic to wildlife and may pose a health risk to humans.

“The center previously sued the EPA for failing to consult over the impacts of these and other pesticides on endangered California red-legged frogs; it obtained an injunction in 2006 imposing restrictions on pesticide use until the consultation was completed. To date those consultations have not been completed.

“In 2013 the center again sued, seeking completion of consultation. In today’s settlement the Fish and Wildlife Service resolved that litigation by agreeing to complete consultation and produce the required “biological opinions” in less than five years. As part of the agreement the agency will consider the pesticides’ impacts not only on red-legged frogs but on all endangered species across the country. The analysis is likely to lead to permanent restrictions on some of the most harmful uses of these highly toxic pesticides.”

Source: summitcountyvoice.com

GR:  Pity the EPA must be forced to perform such analyses.  Since we taxpayers must spend money to sue to force the EPA to do its job, perhaps the EPA should reimburse us by taking salary cuts across upper management.

India: Selling Out To Monsanto. GMOs and the Bigger Picture

On 15 August, India will mark its 67th anniversary of independence from Britain. It may seem strange to some that a nation would publicly celebrate its independence while at the same time it less publicly cedes it to outsiders. The gleaming façade of flags and fly-pasts will belie the fact that national security and independence do not depend on military might and patriotic speeches. Eye-catching celebrations will take place in Delhi and much of the media will mouth platitudes about the strength of the nation and its independence. The reality is, however, an ongoing, concerted attempt to undermine and destroy the very foundation and security of the country.”

Source: www.globalresearch.ca

Thanks to Humans in Shadow and Spirit and Animal for reporting on this article.

GR:  It is painful to compare old films of India’s hopeful, jubilant national attitude and plans for a great future after independence, with conditions today.  We underestimated the power of human nature, especially our innate desires and fears.  Some of the worst elements of our nature are desire to reproduce, desire for wealth,fear of competitors, and fear of strangers.

US Fish and Wildlife Service Ending Neonic and GMO Use in Most National Wildlife Refuges

These elements of “industrial agriculture” are not needed at refuges.  Pressure to ban neonictinoid pesticides and mobilization against GE crops has been growing. The U.S. government is perceived by man…

Source: www.thewildlifenews.com

GR:  The US Fish and Wildlife Service will terminate use of Neonics and GMOs in most wildlife refuges by 2016. Let’s hope this is the start of a change across the US Department of the Interior, the largest manager of US public lands. It will be a struggle; Bayer, Monsanto, Syngenta, and the other large producers of pesticides and/or GMOs will oppose the change with millions of dollars spent on politicians and leaders of the Interior Department’s nine bureaus.

Negatives of Neonicotinoids

Source:  Living With Insects Blog

1-IMG_2232

“The use of neonicotinoid insecticides was widely adopted in the 1990s as one of the few effective pesticides against sweet potato whitefly and other sucking insects. Some of the organophospates with high toxicity to humans were displaced by neonicotinoids with low toxicity to humans, greatly reducing the human health hazards.

“Neonicotinoid use has grown in the last decade, especially as seed treatments. Many crop seeds are only sold treated with neonicotinoids as a “seed insurance” whether or not the grower wants it. The neonicotinoids are being used against variable insect pests that may not even be present. In such situations, harm outweighs benefit. Neonicotinoids have long residual life in the soil and are water soluble. Neonicotinoids are detectable in surface waters near agricultural areas. Plants absorb neonicotinoid from the soil and translocate it into the tissues and plant fluids such as nectar. Neonicotinoids are orders of magnitude more toxic to bees than the insecticide carbaryl, previously the chief cause of complaints from beekeepers. These are all reasons why use should be limited to only where necessary.

“A group of Dutch scientists* have found a correlation between declining populations of some insectivorous birds and neonicotinoid use. They suggest that their observed effect may be due to direct effects of neonicotinoids in the bird’s diet or an indirect effect by decreasing the insect food available to birds. Correlation is not causation and the link needs more supporting evidence to be widely accepted. Aside from the new concerns about birds, there are other concerns that overuse of neonicotinoids on multiple crops will lead to pest resistance. The history of modern synthetic insecticides is filled with instances of insecticide overuse for short-term gain leading to resistance and loss of sustainable value.”

The article on birds:

*Caspar A. Hallmann, Ruud P. B. Foppen, Chris A. M. van Turnhout, Hans de Kroon & Eelke Jongejans. 2014. Declines in insectivorous birds are associated with high neonicotinoid concentrations. Nature: 17 JULY 2014, VOL 511: 341-4.
doi:10.1038/nature13531

How Monsanto and biotech companies violate the Nuremberg Code

“The basic human rights protections established by the Nuremberg Code, which was adopted immediately after the end of World War II, continue to serve as a global template for how human beings are to be treated by the scientific community. But the modern equivalent of the Holocaust is now taking form under the guise of feeding the world and saving the planet, with Monsanto and others in the biotech industry routinely testing their chemicals and faux foods on the public without informed consent, just like amoral scientists did in the death camps.

“As far as medical experiments go, every individual has the right under the Code to consent, or not, to being used in scientific trials or tests that involve toying around with new or unusual substances. This constitutes the essence of the Code, which expressly prohibits human experimentation unless the person being experimented on first gives his or her permission, with full disclosure of any potential adverse events.”

Full article: theresistanceunited.com

GR:  The Nuremberg Code does not protect nonhuman species, but since other species influence human health, it should.

Feds move to restrict neonic pesticides — well, one fed at least

So far the EPA has refused to ban use of neonicotinoid insecticides — despite mounting evidence that they kill bees and other wildlife, despite a ban in the European Union, despite a lawsuit filed by activists and beekeepers.

But if the EPA is somehow still unclear on the dangers posed by neonics, it need only talk to the official who oversees federal wildlife refuges in the Pacific Northwest and Pacific Ocean..

Source: grist.org

Pressure mounts for EPA to ban neonicotinoid insecticides.

Living Without Herbicides

Learning to Live Without Herbicides

Herbicides are among the modern miracles that scientists invented to improve our lives. The labor they save makes them appealing, even habit-forming, and the profit they produce makes companies promote them even after other scientists discovered deadly side effects.

I was a heavy pesticide user.  Biting bugs and giant weeds are among my least favorite things.  It took years to break the pesticide habit.  Here are the three personal experiences that let me escape Monsanto’s clutches:

In 1901, shrubs covered this scene. When I repeated the photo in 2008 (this photo), invasive plants from Asia had replaced almost all the shrubs.

In 1901, shrubs covered this scene. When I repeated the photo in 2008 (this photo), invasive plants from Asia had replaced almost all the shrubs.

1.)  During 15 years in university teaching and researcher, I learned that invasive plants from Asia and Africa have degraded the deserts and desert grasslands of the western U. S.   The experience taught me the dangers of invasive plants, even those that are attractive and seem to be beneficial.

One of the ponds on Coldwater Farm

One of the ponds on Coldwater Farm.

1-20050327-P10107172.)  In 1989, my wife and I purchased a small 20-acre farm in central Arizona, U. S. A.  When we moved in, invasive weeds covered the pastures, driveways, and garden.  We began mowing, pulling, and hoeing.  My father, a life-long farmer whose 1950 degree in agricultural practice had given him faith in new technology, predicted we would have to start using herbicides.  After the first year we did.  For the next few years, I sprayed barrels of 2,4-D on the pastures, and Monsanto’s Roundup(R) on fence rows, driveways, and the margins of pastures and lawns.  I also became a heavy user of chemical fertilizers and garden insecticides.

2,4-D (2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid) is a phenoxy herbicide and plant growth regulator in use in the U.S. since the 1940s. It is found in about 600 products registered for agricultural, residential, industrial and aquatic uses.

I continued to follow the scientific literature, and began seeing more studies tying herbicides to cancer and to wildlife decline.  The U. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulates pesticides, but there is widespread doubt that the Agency’s rulings are reliable.  I had also seen warnings about chemical fertilizers, and I had learned that the earthworms and robins declined when I followed fertilizer manufacturer recommendations for multiple applications in different seasons.

The herbicides used to kill weeds have two undisputed effects on nature:  They can poison arthropods and the animals that eat them, and they eliminate plants that are hosts for Monarch Butterflies and many other small creatures.  The photos show some of the threatened species at Coldwater Farm.

In 2007I stopped using herbicides, insecticides, and chemical fertilizers.

3.)  In 2010 I updated my knowledge of weed research.  I won a contract to write the “Weed-Management Plan” for one of the districts of the U. S. Bureau of Land Management (BLM). I spent five months studying the literature on invasive plants.  I learned that despite many unanswered questions about invasive plants, there are some reliable practices for non-chemical weed control.  I’m working on a post that summarizes the strategies and tactics used to control pests without chemicals.

Related pesticide posts:

Dwindling Bird Numbers Linked to Pesticides-Dutch Study

Beyond Pesticides:  “In addition to earlier research on the direct impacts of pesticides on pollinators and other beneficials, a recent study published by Dutch scientists establishes an additional indirect link between neonicotinoid use and insect-eating birds. The report, which came out on Wednesday, provides evidence that neonicotinoids, a class of systemic pesticides, are indirectly hurting larger creatures by reducing insect prey populations such as mosquitoes and beetles.

“Researchers found that in certain areas of the Netherlands where water is contaminated with high concentrations of imidacloprid, a commonly used neonicotinoid, bird populations tend to decline by an average of 3.5 percent every year. Further analysis found that this spatial pattern of decline appeared only after the introduction of imidacloprid to the Netherlands in the mid-1990s, even after correcting for land-use changes that have been known to affect bird populations in farmland.

“To our surprise we did find a very strong effect on birds”, said lead author of the study, Caspar Hallmann, a Ph.D. student from Radboud University in the Netherlands, to Reuters. In fact, according to the study, which was published in the journal Nature, nine of 15 bird species studied only eat insects and all feed insects to their young. Mr. Hallmann added, “We cannot say this is proof (that the pesticide causes the decline in bird numbers) but we cannot explain the…decline of birds by any other factors.” The study also looked into other possible causes like pollution.”

GR:  Photos are of birds at risk at Coldwater Farm.

“Bayer CropScience issued a speedy response expressing disagreement with the study findings. The company writes that the study did not “demonstrate that there is a causal link between the use of neonicotinoids and the development of bird populations in Europe.” The company went on to say that neonicotinoids “have gone through an extensive risk assessment which has shown that they are safe to the environment when used responsibly according to the label instructions.” The company, along with Syngenta, has been accused of forestalling attempts to ban neonicotinoids via the proposal of bee health plans that call for more research, implementing agricultural best management practices, and planting new habitat. These solutions fail to address the real problem that their products are highly toxic to bees.

“The recent report titled “Worldwide Integrated Assessment (WIA),” undertaken by the Task Force on Systemic Pesticides, indicates otherwise. Twenty-nine scientists representing multiple disciplines analyzed over 800 peer-reviewed publications on the impacts of systemic pesticides. The report emphasizes that neonicotinoids and their metabolites are persistent and harmful, even at very low levels, and that the chemicals have far-reaching impacts on entire ecosystems, from direct exposure to persistence in soil and water. Bees, butterflies, worms, and other pollinators and non-target organisms are also put at risk. Scientists concluded that even when neonicotinoids were used according to guidelines on their labels, the chemicals’ levels in the environment still frequently exceeded the lowest levels known to be harmful to a wide range of species.

“The European Union (E.U.) began implementation of a two-year moratorium in April on neonicotinoids used on flowering crops stemming from scientific evidence that the chemicals are harmful to bees. The pesticides can still be used legally in the E.U. on non-flowering crops, such as barley and wheat, the scientists said. Germany’s Bayer and Switzerland’s Syngenta, the two main producers of the pesticides, have contested the moratorium. They suspect that “colony collapse disorder,” which has resulted in the large drop in bee populations in Europe, Asia, the Americas, and the Middle East, are due to a virus spread by a parasitic mite. Opposition to neonicotinoid use remains strong, however. Syngenta recently withdrew its emergency application to allow the use of neonicotinoids on United Kingdom oilseed rape crops (known as canola in the U.S.) in face of public outcry. According to Reuters, over 200,000 people protested against the request, with around 35,000 more writing to environment secretary Owen Paterson.

“The Dutch study recommends that future legislation consider and take into account the wider impact of pesticides on wildlife. Dave Goulson, Ph.D., of Sussex University, writes in a commentary in Nature that the study was “the first to provide direct evidence that the widespread depletion of insect populations by neonicotinoids has knock-on effects” on larger animals. Dr. Goulson has done work on the far-reaching effects neonicotinoids have on biodiversity and ecosystem health; a review of his from last year found that not only are neonicotinoids the most widely used insecticides in the world, but they persist and accumulate in soil, are prone to leaching into waterways, commonly exceed the LC50 (the concentration which kills 50% of individuals) for beneficial organisms, and the consumption of small numbers of treated seeds presents a direct risk of mortality in birds and mammals.

“Sound familiar? The link between pesticide use and birds is not a new one. Rachel Carson’s book, Silent Spring, chronicled the profligate use of pesticides and their effects on the environment and on birds in particular. While Carson wrote specifically about DDT, an organochlorine pesticide, the message is similar – neonicotinoid pesticides effects have been shown to have widespread consequences on beneficial insects, the environment, and birds.

“Read more about how neonicotinoids affect non-target organisms, or Pierre Mineau’s, Ph.D., in-depth presentation with the American Bird Conservancy on the impact of insecticides on birds. You can also visit our BEE Protective page to learn more about how honey bees and other pollinators are going through rapid population declines, and what you can do to help. Beyond Pesticides has joined with beekeepers and thousands of people and organizations to urge EPA to join the EU in restricting neonicotinoid pesticides.”

Source: Reuters (Alister Doyle), and Beyond Pesticides

All unattributed positions and opinions in this piece are those of Beyond Pesticides