Great Basin rangeland facing challenges with climate change

“Fighting the effects of climate change in Great Basin rangeland is drawing together federal, state and private interests to deal with what scientists say is greater weather variability causing big swings in forage available for cattle and wildlife.” More at www.idahostatesman.com.

(The photograph shows an impoverished cheatgrass landscape that native shrub vegetation occupied a century ago.)

GR:  Since people introduced cheatgrass to the region in the late 1800’s, the little weedy Asian grass has replaced native vegetation across millions of acres. A tremendous loss of natural productivity occurred as native plant and animal species declined.
Cheatgrass carries fire better than native plants. Fire frequency has increased, and native plants don’t have time to establish and mature before the next fire. Cheatgrass seeds survive the fires, and without competitors, the plant continues to increase.
For almost a century, range scientists have tried everything they can think of to control cheatgrass. They have failed, and it appears that the plant has become a permanent resident. There are only two reasonable management approaches now. First, remove domestic livestock so that the remaining native wildlife can survive on the impoverished cheatgrass ranges. And second, try to protect and preserve the few remaining areas with no cheatgrass.

Sonoran Desert Fire Ecology Update

Post-Fire Recovery in the Arizona Upland of the Sonoran Desert

Fire-prone invasive plants fueled fires that converted this formerly diverse Sonoran Desert landscape of small trees and tall Saguaro cactus into an impoverished shrubland.

Fire-prone invasive plants fueled fires that converted this formerly diverse Sonoran Desert landscape of small trees and tall Saguaro cactus into an impoverished shrubland.

By Garry Rogers.

The Sonoran Desert’s diverse vegetation of small round trees, tall cacti, and understory shrubs is remarkably beautiful. I was fortunate to spend my early career studying the desert. One of my projects involved wildfire.

Following fires in 1974, my classmate Jeff Steele and I used repeated observations of permanent plots and transects to measure fire-related adaptive responses of perennial plant species and communities.  We expected to find that desert plants were recovering by sprouting from unburned roots and stems and from seeds buried in the soil.  We expected this because of the “fire is natural” rebellion that was opposing traditional “Smokey the Bear” fire suppression efforts.  We wanted to be rebels too.  What we found was that positive adaptations that would allow recovery after burning were common, but they were weak.  Most plants just burned to death and stayed dead.  Return of the original plant community was taking place very slowly.  We projected that several decades would be required for full recovery.

After we published the initial results, both sites burned again.  We repeated our observations of the plots and transects several times.  In 2008, I reported that 22 years after the second fires, recovery had not occurred (Turner et al. 2010).  Only a few fast-growing members of the original plant community had returned, and large numbers of fire-prone invasive alien plants occupied both sites.  A brief inspection in 2015 indicated that conditions had not improved.  It appears unlikely that the original diverse vegetation dominated by tall Saguaro Cacti and round green Paloverde trees will ever return.  Fighting fires in the desert was the right strategy.

Perhaps no fire in the Sonoran Desert has been natural since the introduction and spread of exotic annuals.  Both frequency and intensity have increased.

Climate Change and Desert Fire

The lengthening drought in the region occupied by the Sonoran Desert is accelerating the replacement of the original plant communities by fire-prone weeds. Weed landscapes are spreading and fires are becoming more frequent. Watching the disappearance of the original complex desert vegetation is one of my saddest experiences.

  • Citation:  Rogers, Garry, and Jeff Steele.  1980. Sonoran desert fire ecology.  Pages 15-19 in M. A. Stokes and J. H. Dieterich, technical coordinators.  Proceedings of the fire history workshop.  U. S. Forest Service, General Technical Report RM-81.  Link to PDF copy of paper.
  • Reference:  Tuner, Raymond M., Robert H. Webb, Todd C. Esque, Garry Rogers.  2010.  Repeat photography and low elevation fire responses in the southwestern United States. Pages 223-244 in R. H. Webb, D. E. Boyer, and R. M. Turner, eds. Repeat photography methods and applications in the natural sciences. Island Press, Washington, DC. 530 p.

Nature News Digests

GarryRogersNature News Digests:

Is Climate the Funhouse Mirror for Animal Size & Shape?

Great article. The biologically boring future has been exemplified by weed

From Climatebites

From Climatebites

invasions of the past where single species replaced diverse species groups. The rate of selection for successful traits varies across species. Invasive species with short generation times are the best candidates for surviving something such as anthropogenic climate change that occurs in years and decades. Short-lived weeds and arthropods will be with us a long time. Longer-lived, slower-reproducing species such as giant redwoods, whales, elephants, and moose, probably won’t. Humans are in this second group. If our technology ever fails to protect us from the changing environment, we will be gone too.

Richard Conniff's avatarstrange behaviors

My latest for Takepart:

There’s plenty of evidence that species are already relocating in response to climate change. Tarpon now show up in summer as far north as Maryland. Humboldt squid have recently moved up from South and Central America into California. But is climate change also affecting the size and shape of animals’ bodies, or the way they function?

I first started thinking about the idea when I ran across a 2013 study of ocean acidification. It’s a subject I had scrupulously avoided until then because the words “ocean acidification” are, let’s face it, sleep-inducing. But stay with me a moment: The oceans have soaked up about a third of all the carbon dioxide put into the atmosphere by human activity over the past three centuries, with the result that marine creatures now live in water that is 30 percent more acidic than in pre-industrial times.

Think of it…

View original post 829 more words

Introduced species and biodiversity

https://www.youtube.com/v/wRgJ-IexHKk?fs=1&hl=fr_FR

Great animation from the California Academy of Sciences about Introduced or exotic species, how and when they become also invasive, and the problems … Sourced through Scoop.it from: www.youtube.com

GR:  This is one of three excellent presentations.  I highly recommend them to anyone who wishes to learn more or teach more about these critical subjects. I once believed that invasive species would wreck Earth’s ecosystems before global warming became a serious force.  The effects of global warming are coming faster than expected, however, and I now believe that stopping our CO2 emissions is our number one priority, a little ahead of reducing our population, preventing invasive species introductions, and so forth.

Predators and the food chain and preventing the suburban extinction of small native creatures

“It is springtime here in Mount Waverley, close to the Reserve. The air is filled all day with the anguished squawks of smaller birds vainly trying to divert enormous crows from taking babies from their nests. Pairs of noisy miners are squawking at crows; by dusk, they must be exhausted. In our reserve, the Australian raven terrorises the other birds and dive-bombs the smaller dogs. The bellbirds keep their portion of the reserve, and will not let other birds colonise their areas.

“Every spring there are fewer little birds. Wrens and tits, which were quite plentiful in our garden twenty years ago, seem to have gone. Crows can be seen sometimes flying down the street with little birds in their beaks. We had no crows twenty years ago here. They are out of their ecological niche, whether native or exotic. The little birds have an ecological function in getting rid of noxious insects and other garden pests and these proliferate without them.

“Surely small birds have enough predators with cats, foxes and cars. Surely there is no need to protect all of the growing hordes of native crows or Australian ravens, on the grounds they have an important role in the food chain and they are native.  Sourced through Scoop.it from: www.onlineopinion.com.au

GR:  Habitat destruction, invasive species introductions are parts of the actions we have taken to begin Earth’s sixth mass extinction.

Grazing Leads to Blazing

“Livestock grazing in southwestern Idaho and across the West has contributed significantly to intensity, severity, and enormity of fires this summer. Important habitat for sage-grouse, redband trout, other wildlife species is now ablaze. Despite the livestock industry’s claims to the contrary, the Idaho fires are burning hotter and faster because of the impacts of cows and sheep on our arid western lands.”  Sourced through Scoop.it from: www.thewildlifenews.com

GR:  The photo shows a degraded landscape that was covered by dense shrubs before domestic livestock grazing brought cheatgrass and other fire-prone winter/spring annuals to the region.  Frequent fires have swept away the shrubs.  The wild horses in the scene survive because a few sunflowers and other summer annuals appear after the cows are trucked away to feedlots each summer when the spring cheatgrass is all gone.

Students create tool to stop pests in their tracks

Every day, invasive species threaten the health of vital agricultural and natural lands, from plants like the fast-growing kudzu vine to animals like the pernicious red scale insect that chomps through citrus crops. The US Department of Agriculture estimates invasives to be a $120 billion problem annually.

Now there is a new tool to help in the fight against these non-native pests, developed by three college students during their summer research program at the National Institute for Mathematical and Biological Synthesis (NIMBioS).

“Prevention is the most cost-effective method for controlling the spread of invasives, but it can be difficult without the proper knowledge. With ComFlo, we aim to provide the information to identify significant pathways of invasion so that managers know which sites to focus their resources on,” said co-developer Ryan Yan, a student majoring in mathematical biology at the College of William and Mary.

Biosecurity Protects Islands

“Without island biosecurity pests will rapidly recolonize islands from which they have been eradicated, or worse still colonise islands for the first time. Only with a rigorous audited biosecurity programme can pest-free status be maintained. The gold standard in New Zealand is Nature Reserve islands like Antipodes Island, where quarantine occurs before, during and after arrival, surveillance occurs pre and post border, and incursion response strategies are in place. The New Zealand Department of Conservation operates a robust island biosecurity programme to protect their conservation investments, but it was reported in the news today that last year numbers spiked, including mice, rats, cats and stoats all making it out to islands. Stranger critters such as ferrets and even otters have reached New Zealand’s offshore islands in the past. Unlike the original pest eradications which cleared these islands, and were years in the planning, a response to an incursion must, as DOC manager Andy Cox points out, be as rapid as if a forest fire had broken out. Pest incursions are the biological equivalent of chemical spills, only the agent can keep reproducing.”  Sourced through Scoop.it from: voices.nationalgeographic.com

GR:  Biosecurity is another term for nature conservation.  It is a relevant concern planet wide.  This article focuses on invasive species, but there are more things people do that are affecting  biosecurity on land and sea.

My lineup for the worst human impacts on nature are:  Greenhouse gases (global warming, ocean acidification), habitat destruction (construction and farming), invasive species (includes disease), resource use (fishing, gathering, grazing, hunting, recreation, and water diversion), and toxic wastes (other than greenhouse gases).  Behind them all looms the great instigator, human population growth.