Post 5: Ignorance of Innocence, Evidence from the Desert

Theories can be dismissed. Long-term data cannot.

In 1974, a fire burned through the vegetation along Dead Man Wash in the Sonoran Desert uplands north of Phoenix, AZ. Giant Saguaro cacti were scattered along the wash. Between them grew diverse native perennials adapted to arid conditions over millions of years.

Fifty years of monitoring revealed what happened next.

After the fire, invasive annual grasses established and spread, creating continuous fuel beds where none existed before. Fire frequency increased throughout the desert and each fire killed fire-sensitive natives. Without the diseases and consumers of their Asian homeland, the invasive grasses soon created a continuous carpet of fine fuel where none had exted before.

A feedback loop emerged: more grass, more fuel, more fire, more native mortality, more open ground, more grass, etc. The system crossed a threshold and reorganized in a new stable state. The Saguaros did not bounce back. They vanished.

Left: Common scene in the Arizona Upland of the Sonoran Desert.
Right: The new scene spreading across the deseert.

To a visitor encountering the site today, the weedy landscape appears normal. The memory of the Saguaro forest has been erased.

This pattern repeats across every biome on Earth. The Amazon is savannizing. Coral reefs are shifting to algal dominance. Some changes cannot be undone. Restoration would require immense, unattainable financing and has become an obsolete concept.

[Read the full essay here.]

[Read the series introduction and access all nine essays here.]

Post 9: Ignorance of Innocence, Plain Member and Citizen

Aldo Leopold wrote in 1949 that we abuse land because we see it as commodity. When we see it as our community to which we belong, we tend to use it with more respect.

Becoming a “plain member and citizen” of the biosphere means relinquishing exceptionalism. We are not the rulers of Earth. We are one species among millions. We are participants in an ancient web of relationships, nodes in the biosphere’s cognitive community.

Acceptance requires the demise of the industrial ego. We must realize that we do not stand apart from nature. Technological prowess allows us to use and wreck planetary systems, but we need those systems to survive. The contemporary industrial ego with its desire for eternal growth permeates modern consciousness so thoroughly that alternatives seem impossible. Yet it is hubris. It is a recent development enabled by fossil fuel abundance. It will not survive the thermodynamic correction now underway.

What emerges from the correction does not have to be humanity’s diminishment it could be our fulfillment. Our intelligence can mature into sapience. We need not reject civilization but right-size it to sustainable scale.

Post 8: Ignorance of Innocence, Three Principles of Maturation

Three principles define the shift from adolescence to maturity, from destroyer to steward.

Ecocentricity means rejecting the view that nature exists for human utility. It means recognizing intrinsic value throughout the biosphere. Rivers have worth independent of irrigation potential. Forests matter beyond timber value. Species deserve protection not for ecosystem services but because they exist. New Zealand’s Whanganui River, granted legal personhood in 2017, embodies this principle in law.

Interdependence means acknowledging that no organism exists alone. The illusion of independence proves strong in urban societies, where food appears in supermarkets and water flows from taps. Ecology shows this illusion is fiction. Every organism depends on countless others. Human wellbeing requires biosphere wellbeing.

Reciprocity means moving from extraction to exchange. Industrial civilization takes resources, produces goods, and discards waste while the biosphere receives nothing in return except degradation. Reciprocity asks not only what we can extract but what we can contribute to ecosystem health. This is partnership, not parasitism.

Together, these principles transform the human-biosphere relationship from exploitation to citizenship.

[Read the full essay here.]

[Read the series introduction and access all nine essays here.]

Post 7: Ignorance of Innocence, Cognitive Adaptation

Humans possess something no other species has: the capacity to think about our own thinking.

We can identify our biases and design systems to counteract them. We can study collapsed civilizations and extract lessons applicable today. We can model futures and change course before critical impacts. We can consciously direct cultural evolution rather than stumbling through it blindly.

This metacognitive capacity is the ultimate human adaptation. Chimpanzees solve problems but cannot design institutions to overcome their cognitive limitations. Dolphins communicate but cannot write histories documenting their mistakes. Only humans can anticipate distant futures and deliberately choose to evolve.

Cognitive adaptation means recognizing that optimism bias, temporal discounting, and shifting baselines are not character flaws but universal features of human information processing. It means building governance systems that account for these biases rather than assuming rational actors. It means cultivating ecological consciousness through direct nature experience, systems education, and intergenerational knowledge transfer.

The transformation from conqueror to citizen is no longer just an ideal. It is a survival strategy. The ultimate test of human intelligence will be our ability to live wisely on Earth.

Post 6: Ignorance of Innocence, Suffering as Teacher

We refused to mature through foresight. Now we must mature through catastrophe.

This is not punishment. It is pedagogy. The floods, fires, famines, and extinctions are initiatory ordeals—the only teachers capable of piercing frameworks that voluntary learning could not penetrate.

Developmental psychology reveals the pattern. Adolescents often require painful experiences to accept realities they have intellectually ignored. Warnings prove insufficient. The crash teaches what caution could not. The loss instructs where abundance taught nothing.

Philosopher Glen Albrecht named the grief following the ecological losses paralleling our carelessness “solastalgia.” This is the distress caused by transformation of familiar places. Climate scientists report psychological anguish from witnessing planetary degradation. Farmers mourn disappearing seasons. Children express anxiety about futures they feel have been stolen.

This grief serves essential function. It breaks through cognitive barriers—optimism bias, shifting baselines, strategic ignorance—that insulate consciousness from environmental truth. Direct experience of loss penetrates defenses that data cannot.

The tragic irony is clear. The cognitive biases preventing voluntary transformation ensure that transformation will come through suffering. The teachers arrive uninvited, bearing lessons no one wants.

Post 1: The Biosphere as Cognitive Community

We assume cognition (thinking, memory, and emotion) is only possible for humans and a few other species. This assumption is wrong.

Bacteria detect chemical gradients and remember previous exposures. Plants learn from experience and communicate through fungal networks. Crows fashion tools and teach solutions to other crows. Rats choose to rescue drowning companions even when food rewards are offered as alternatives.

These are not anthropomorphic projections. They represent measurable cognitive capacities distributed throughout the tree of life. The biosphere is not a collection of mindless resources surrounding islands of human intelligence. It is a vast network of thinking beings processing information at scales from molecular to planetary.

This recognition transforms how we understand human compassion toward animals. When we rescue stranded dogs or tend injured birds, we are not projecting emotions onto empty vessels. We are recognizing fellow participants in an ancient cognitive community. Our empathy reflects biological inheritance, not cultural overlay.

Human cognition is extraordinary—but it is an elaboration of capacities found throughout life, not a break from them. We are not the sole possessors of mind. We are participants in something far larger.

#WildforLife – Backed by Stars, UN Campaign Seeks to Mobilize Millions to End Illegal Trade in Wildlife

GR.–Publicity campaigns work best when we design them to appeal to the correct audience.  Is the typical customer for poached animals and their body parts likely to respond to celebrity messages?  It seems unlikely that the poachers will.  Nevertheless, celebrities will draw attention to the issue, and though they might not evoke a response among the customers, they might create public attitudes that can indirectly influence customers.  And for the public, knowing a problem exists is a great step toward solution.

Ban Ki-moon, Gisele Bündchen, Yaya Touré and Ian Somerhalder among those aiming to spur action to protect endangered species

UN, Nairobi, Wednesday, 25 May 2016.–“The United Nations, backed by A-list celebrities from across the globe, today launched an unprecedented campaign against the illegal trade in wildlife, which is pushing species to the brink of extinction, robbing countries of their natural heritage and profiting international criminal networks.

“Each year, thousands of wild animals are illegally killed, often by organized criminal networks motivated by profit and greed,” said Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon. “I call on all Governments and people everywhere to support the new United Nations campaign, Wild for Life, which aims to mobilize the world to end this destructive trade. Preserving wildlife is crucial for the well-being of people and planet alike.”

“#WildforLife, launched today at the second United Nations Environment Assembly (UNEA-2) in Nairobi in front of environment ministers from every corner of the planet, aims to mobilize millions of people to make commitments and take action to end the illegal trade.”  Continue reading:  Backed by Stars, Unprecedented UN Campaign Seeks to Mobilize Millions to End Illegal Trade in Wildlife

Save

Legal ivory sale drove dramatic increase in elephant poaching, study shows | Environment | The Guardian

Damian Carrington, Monday 13 June 2016:  Research shows the legal sale in 2008 catastrophically backfired – but two African nations want to repeat the stockpile sell-off.

A huge legal sale of ivory intended to cut elephant poaching instead catastrophically backfired by dramatically increasing elephant deaths, according to new research.

The revelation comes just months before a decision on whether to permit another legal sale and against a backdrop of more African elephants being killed for ivory than are being born. In 2015 alone, 20,000 elephants were illegally killed.

The international trade in ivory was banned in 1989 but, in 2008, China and Japan were allowed to pay $15m for 107 tonnes of ivory stockpiled from elephants that died naturally in four African nations. The intention was to flood the market, crash prices and make poaching less profitable.

But instead, the legal sale was followed by “an abrupt, significant, permanent, robust and geographically widespread increase” in elephant poaching, concluded researchers Prof Solomon Hsiang at the University of California Berkeley and Nitin Sekar at Princeton University, whose work was published on Monday.  Continue Reading: Legal ivory sale drove dramatic increase in elephant poaching, study shows | Environment | The Guardian

Save

The Great Barrier Reef and the subtle power of ‘psychological distance’

This photo released on 20 April, 2016 by XL Catlin Seaview Survey shows a turtle swimming over bleached coral at Heron Island on the Great Barrier Reef. Photograph: STR/AFP/Getty Images

Don HIne.–If the federal government wants Australians to ignore the Great Barrier Reef as it dies beside us, it has done a masterful job by scrubbing all mentions of the reef from the latest UN climate change report.

The government’s actions have been described as Soviet in style and intent but the political thuggery pales compared to the activation of a subtler and more powerful effect known as psychological distance.

Psychological distance is a construct that measures the “distance” of an event or object in terms of geography, time, cultural similarity and factual certainty. If something is nearby, likely to occur soon, involves people like you, and the facts are certain, that “something” is considered psychologically close. The closer it is, the more likely you are to perceive it as concrete and be willing and able to act on it.  Continue:  The Great Barrier Reef and the subtle power of ‘psychological distance’ | Don Hine | Australia news | The Guardian

Save